Spending Review 2013: History Repeating?

As the Spending Review (26 June) draws closer, speculation is rife about whether or not, and how, George Osborne will achieve the extra £11.5 billion in savings from welfare and departmental spending in 2015-16 that he is said to want. So far only about £3.6bn has been agreed, and the rest is the subject of fierce fighting across Whitehall.

In this context I found this fascinating section in a book about the history of the UK Treasury:

“ The retrenchment scheme of 22 July 1668, which made a detailed apportionment of the king’s annual expenditure, totalling £746,475 15s 10d plus £250,000 for interest charges and contingencies, was the product of a Privy Council sub-committee of five (alter seven) senior ministers and five Treasury Lords. In their proceedings the onus lay primarily on the ministers to make economies in the departments – the various branches of the royal household, the forces, the pension list, embassies, etc. Initially, they worked with pathetic timidity: ‘the Cormorant Keeper to be taken away by which will be saved £84. Keeper of the Volary cut off, £30.’ In November 1667 Charles was presented with an estimate that, against revenue of less than £900,000 p.a. he must set an annual expenditure of £1, 242, 855 16s 8d. Dismayed, he ordered the committee to try again….” (The Treasury 1660-1870, Henry Roseveare, 1973).

Sounds familiar?


About Prof. Colin Talbot

Research Associate, University of Cambridge Professor of Government (Emeritus), University of Manchester
This entry was posted in Whitehall. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s